Home Main Forums Down Ticket Elections US Senate race in NC — the issue is… flags.

  • spud demon (556 posts)
    Profile photo of spud demon Donor

    US Senate race in NC — the issue is… flags.

    In the super-close race between Deborah Ross (D) and Richard Burr (R), the Burr people have decided to make flags an issue.

    As an ACLU lawyer, Ross defended the right to burn the American flag as free speech.  But she declined to aid a veteran who was threatened with a civil lawsuit for breaking local rules concerning flag poles.

    http://freebeacon.com/politics/new-ad-hammers-deborah-ross-defending-flag-burning-not-right-fly-one/

    Enthusiast, Hari, jwirr and 1 otherMarym625 like this
    Cubs, Google+, Weird Al, BMW

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

▼ Hide Reply Index
33 replies
    • Marym625 (11959 posts)
      Profile photo of Marym625 Admin

      1. you're on the Spotlight!

      Thank you Spud Demon!

      That’s one hell of a claim to fame, kicked off of Facebook by Her. :)

      821484_1
      • spud demon (556 posts)
        Profile photo of spud demon Donor

        5. Thank you!

        Kicking people with dissenting views off of forums is a tried and true tactic of CTR.  Clinton is the new Nixon:  politically moderate, but Her methods are reprehensible.

        Cubs, Google+, Weird Al, BMW
        • FanBoy (4481 posts)
          Profile photo of FanBoy

          8. Nixon was the last liberal – more liberal policy to his credit than the Clintons

          and whatever his methods, he was taken down by the ptb

        • Marym625 (11959 posts)
          Profile photo of Marym625 Admin

          12. she out does Nixon by a long shot

          Amazing. And this time we have no truth in M$M

          821484_1
          • spud demon (556 posts)
            Profile photo of spud demon Donor

            16. She has more modern tools than Nixon did.

            It is very ironic the Washington Post supports her, after it won the nation’s hearts by taking down the same type of person in the 70s.

            I had a visit from a Dem canvasser today.  He said he supported Bernie in the primary and was supporting Hillary now because her stated positions are more reasonable than the Republican candidate.

            I agreed that She was a better centrist than the opposition, and so was Nixon.  I also told him Trump was her puppet, so if he wins she wins.

            But I did accept his recommendations for the local town council races.  We can liberalize this country from the bottom up.  Down Ballot!

            Cubs, Google+, Weird Al, BMW
            • Marym625 (11959 posts)
              Profile photo of Marym625 Admin

              17. Absolutely!

              It’s what we have to do.

              821484_1
    • Arctic Dave (659 posts)
      Profile photo of Arctic Dave

      2. I have found out that NC is a very politically strange place.

      I am surprised NC isn’t more blue.

      It’s seems like most people are open minded and more diverse then some states that I have been through.

       

      I guess a lot of  the republican support has to do with the large amount of military bases there.

       

      Note:

      i thought it was weird they sang the national anthem before a metal concert.

      • Billy (1979 posts)
        Profile photo of Billy Banned

        It’s the churches that influence the people of southern states to be republican.

      • goodgirl (1815 posts)
        Profile photo of goodgirl Donor

        4. Don't forget guns.

        Mankind must put an end to war before war puts an end to mankind.    John F. Kennedy
        • Arctic Dave (659 posts)
          Profile photo of Arctic Dave

          7. That's pretty much every state.

          Gun nuts are universal.

          • FanBoy (4481 posts)
            Profile photo of FanBoy

            9. so are religious nuts, more and more. imo, being deliberately seeded and

            there’s a large pool of takers because of poor economic conditions

            • Arctic Dave (659 posts)
              Profile photo of Arctic Dave

              10. I believe people are becoming aware of how

              disposable to the powers that be and they are looking for anything that makes them feel safe and wanted.

               

              I think this is a recipe for bad things to happen. :/

              • FanBoy (4481 posts)
                Profile photo of FanBoy

                11. for sure

              • fluff (381 posts)
                Profile photo of fluff

                19. So they're clinging to their guns & bibles.

                "It's called 'the American dream' because you have to be asleep to believe it." - George Carlin #robertreich2020foresight
                • Arctic Dave (659 posts)
                  Profile photo of Arctic Dave

                  21. Pretty much.

                  Neither will help in the long run. It didn’t help last time when the ptb destroyed the economy and offshored jobs

    • spud demon (556 posts)
      Profile photo of spud demon Donor

      13. My own take on the flag issue

      Apples and oranges:

      NC law makes it a criminal offense to burn a flag.  I disagree with this, as does ACLU.

      The flag-flying case was about a neighborhood covenant concerning flag poles.  There was no actual lawsuit filed, and the guy won the right to fly the flag without any help from the ACLU.  Good for him.  And good for Deborah Ross for staying out of what should be a private matter.

      Cubs, Google+, Weird Al, BMW
      • Arctic Dave (659 posts)
        Profile photo of Arctic Dave

        15. Agree 100%

        ploitics is never about facts and common sense though. :/

      • davidgmills (3549 posts)
        Profile photo of davidgmills Donor

        27. Neighborhood covenents, home owner's associations, and deed restrictions

        Are indeed a can of worms, but of a much different variety.  Not something the ACLU is likely to become involved with.

        French Revolution; not secession.
    • Sriracha (2153 posts)
      Profile photo of Sriracha Donor

      22. She's a former lobbyist.

      I’ll be voting 3rd party in that race.

      • spud demon (556 posts)
        Profile photo of spud demon Donor

        23. Do you mean as legal counsel for Go Triangle?

        Other than that stint, it seems she’s been pretty busy as a legislator.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deborah_K._Ross

        doesn’t contain the word “lobbyist”.

        If you’re talking about her work for the ACLU, that’s the kind of lobbyist I love!

        Cubs, Google+, Weird Al, BMW
        • Sriracha (2153 posts)
          Profile photo of Sriracha Donor

          24. I don't like any lobbyists.

          Think lobbying should be outlawed.

           

          • jeff47 (527 posts)
            Profile photo of jeff47 Donor

            25. So who did she lobby for? (nt)

            • spud demon (556 posts)
              Profile photo of spud demon Donor

              26. I don't know if her duties included lobbying per se…

              But two organizations she worked for, who presumably do some amount of lobbying, were:

              Both organizations activities would be acceptable to typical progressives, IMHO.

              Cubs, Google+, Weird Al, BMW
              • jeff47 (527 posts)
                Profile photo of jeff47 Donor

                28. So…you have no idea if she actually did any lobbying. (nt)

                • spud demon (556 posts)
                  Profile photo of spud demon Donor

                  29. That's a very trollish and insulting response to my honest attempt to inform.

                  I posted what I do know about the places she worked, and I stated that I don’t know if her duties included lobbying, which I would define as professionally making contact with elected officials for the purpose of influencing them.

                  You should not care so much what I know, as what you know.  Feel free to do additional research.

                  Cubs, Google+, Weird Al, BMW
                  • jeff47 (527 posts)
                    Profile photo of jeff47 Donor

                    30. Your honest attempt to inform that lacked honesty.

                    I stated that I don’t know if her duties included lobbying

                    And since you previously implied she was a lobbyist, that’s not exactly an honest attempt to inform, is it?

                    You should not care so much what I know, as what you know. Feel free to do additional research.

                    Yes, it’s soooooo impossible to find out the history of a candidate….oh wait! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deborah_K._Ross

                     

                    • spud demon (556 posts)
                      Profile photo of spud demon Donor

                      31. That was Sriracha who said she was.

                      And you’re repeating a link I already provided, which I stated “doesn’t contain the word “lobbyist”.”

                      Cubs, Google+, Weird Al, BMW
                    • TM99 (4474 posts)
                      Profile photo of TM99

                      32. Her opponent classified her

                      as a ‘lobbyist’ for the heathen hippy ACLU.  She was a staff lawyer during the 1990’s and a good one.

                      Let’s try to remain civil when obviously a misunderstanding has occurred.

                      Thanks.

                      I used to have a photo of Putin giving the finger as a protest to all of the anti-Russian hysterics and fake news non-sense.  Admin said to remove it because they and certain members thought it was a fuck you to the site and the members.  It was not.  

                      “To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.” -- Voltaire

          • JimLane (750 posts)
            Profile photo of Jim Lane

            33. How broad should that be?

            Suppose the troglodytes in the state legislature propose a bill to outlaw flag burning, or to require every homeowner to post a cross at Easter, or some such.  Are you saying that paid staffers of the ACLU should be prohibited from contacting legislators to urge them to oppose the bill?

            If that’s not what you’re saying, then I don’t understand what “lobbying should be outlawed” means, and I’d be glad of clarification.