Bruce Ohr Warned FBI Leadership That Steele Was Biased Against Trump And Dossier Funded by DNC

Homepage | Forums | Main Forums | Latest Breaking News | Bruce Ohr Warned FBI Leadership That Steele Was Biased Against Trump And Dossier Funded by DNC

  • Author
  • #110676

    • Total Posts: 187

    Newly obtained documents confirm that James Comey’s FBI was running a secret and corrupt counterintelligence operation against the Trump campaign in the summer of 2016 and repeatedly deceiving the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) thereafter in order to wiretap a Trump campaign associate.

    The disclosure was the result of a federal lawsuit and a year of litigation. Despite efforts by FBI Director Christopher Wray to obstruct, a federal court issued an order that forced the FBI and Department of Justice to produce the records known as “302 reports.” They are a summary of interviews FBI agents conducted with Bruce Ohr, a top DOJ official.

    These 302s show that the FBI and DOJ were warned repeatedly by Ohr that ex-British spy Christopher Steele was virulently biased against the target of their investigation, Trump.

    That bias tainted the credibility of the “dossier” Steele composed and upon which officials in the Obama administration relied when they officially launched their counterintelligence investigation on July 31, 2016. The “dossier” was also the basis for the surveillance warrant against former Trump campaign adviser, Carter Page.

  • #110702

    • Total Posts: 1,912

    seems like literally nobody had their heart in this, and many even wanted to see Hillary indicted (they didn’t know the DNCleaks timed for Philly would’ve let her almost be levered out); Obama oversaw all this while knowing she was nonviable

    and yet Clinton was able to twist everyone’s arms while actually having no power or constituency other than the DNC bailout

    • #111498

      Nick Xylas
      • Total Posts: 56

      I don’t know who Sara Carter is, but I see that the report first appeared at Fox “News”. And since when is opposition to Trump something we’re supposed to be angered by?

      Edit: sorry, that was supposed to be a reply to virtualobserver’s post below. I’ll get the hang of this forum software one day.


  • #110823

    • Total Posts: 109

    Sara Carter?   I think that anyone rational who spent any time looking at Trump and his actions would have a negative opinion of him.  I would not call it a “bias”.

  • #110981

    • Total Posts: 447


    Destruction is easy; creation is hard, but more interesting.

  • #111633

    Babel 17
    • Total Posts: 1,987

    So there were some top people at the FBI determined to win Clinton’s gratitude, or at least not piss her off, because they knew how she rolled, and were so afraid of her that they were willing to undermine our system of justice and law enforcement, in a big way.

    One can only imagine in a frightened awe at what influence she’d have exerted had she been elected President. One giant grifting machine that took care of all the Friends of Clinton. The globalists and war mongers would have been rejoicing, and Syria would be in ashes.

    Chelsea would be running a trillion dollar foundation, and Bill would be getting serviced by girls taking a break from reading Tiger Beat.

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.