RadicleFantast (1636 posts)October 27, 2016 at 10:15 am
Daily Beast on Jill Stein’s Investment Portfolio
Read it here if you’re a sucker and Hill-ass-lickerTuesday, valerief, jdpriestly like this
“We’re not going to accept no more hemming and hawing. No more game playing. Make your stand.”
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
HomerRamone (444 posts) (Reply to original post) October 27, 2016 at 11:39 am
1. Jill Stein Responds to Daily Beast Smear Attack
Jill Stein Responds to Daily Beast Smear Attack By Calling for Disclosure of Chelsea Clinton’s Role as Director of Beast’s Parent Corporation
In response to an article from Daily Beast reporter Yashar Ali published on October 26, Green Party presidential candidate Dr. Jill Stein challenged “the willful misinformation and manipulative framing” of the Daily Beast article as “a blatant smear attack and hypocritical attempt to suggest conflicts of interest in my environmental and economic justice-focused campaign.”
Dr. Stein noted: “If Mr. Ali is truly interested in conflicts of interest of political candidates and their families, where is his disclosure on the conflict of interest posed by Chelsea Clinton’s position as a director of the corporate owner of the Daily Beast, IAC? He has created an imagined conflict of interest, perhaps to distract from the very real, harmful conflicts of interest in the Clintons’ pay-to-play schemes, back-room fundraising, and quarter-million dollar speeches for the predatory banks, health insurance industry, and fossil fuel tycoons, who have directly benefited from Hillary Clinton’s policy record as Senator and Secretary of State, as well as from Bill Clinton’s actions as President.”
Mr. Ali has failed to show a conflict of interest in Dr. Stein’s investments, as her policy positions have consistently opposed the interests of the companies that form a portion of most index and mutual fund profiles. By his logic, he insinuates that the 50 million plus Americans who have retirement accounts invested in mutual and index funds – including school teachers, public workers, and employees of any company that provides such funds to workers as a benefit – can never speak out or organize against corporate abuses. This disingenuous shaming exercise is an effort to silence dissent, and a blunt attempt to bully people into refraining from exercising their democratic rights to free speech and political action.
Below is Dr. Stein’s full rebuttal to the Daily Beast, which updates her original comment sent prior to publication:
Snort McDork (2721 posts) (Reply to HomerRamone - post #1) October 31, 2016 at 3:14 am