Expert Has a BRILLIANT Strategy for Democrats to Protect Their Progressive Agenda from the Conservative Supreme Court

Homepage | Forums | Main Forums | General Discussion | Expert Has a BRILLIANT Strategy for Democrats to Protect Their Progressive Agenda from the Conservative Supreme Court

Viewing 5 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #398679
      Segami
      Participant
      • Total Posts: 5,084

       

       

       

      Sounds like a plan has emerged…….

       

      “….Instead of thinking about court packing, Poddar suggests, Democrats should consider “another way to stop the Court from totally derailing progressive economic reform that Democrats can use right now….”

       

       

      Although Democrats now control the White House and both houses of Congress, there is one branch of the federal government where their ideas presently have very little influence: the U.S. Supreme Court. President Joe Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi find themselves saddled with the most right-wing Supreme Court in generations. But writer Keshav Poddar, in an article published by Slate this week, offers a possible Supreme Court coping strategy for Biden’s administration and Democrats in Congress: essentially, backup plans for their legislation. “Against all odds, an ideologically reinvigorated Democratic Party has won the House, Senate and presidency,” Poddar observes. “Democrats have the opportunity to finally deliver long-overdue reforms to address structural economic inequality, provide every American with adequate health care and take aggressive action to save our environment before it is too late. But (Senate) Minority Leader Mitch McConnell has left Democrats with one big problem: the courts.” Although Democrats have won the popular vote in six of the last seven presidential elections, six of the nine current Supreme Court justices were appointed by Republican presidents. Some liberal pundits have proposed packing the court — that is, increasing the number of justices, which President Franklin Delano Roosevelt proposed during the 1930s. But Poddar points out that Democrats’ slim majority in the Senate simply isn’t enough for the type of “knockdown, drag-out fight that such a move would require.” Instead of thinking about court packing, Poddar suggests, Democrats should consider “another way to stop the Court from totally derailing progressive economic reform that Democrats can use right now.”

       

      Democrats could deploy a new legislative tactic that has never been tried before: They can include ‘clearly constitutional’ precautionary backup provisions in progressive legislation that would automatically take effect if the primary policies in the bill are invalidated,” Poddar recommends. “The backup provisions would usually involve extreme, but undeniably constitutional, policies designed to achieve the same original goals as the preferred policy. This will either force the Court to lay off of progressive programs, or enable progressive policy aims to be achieved even if it intervenes.” Poddar goes on to offer an example of how such an approach would work. If Congress passed a 2% wealth tax on fortunes over $100 million but Pelosi’s attorneys warned that Republicans would challenge the tax as unconstitutional in the courts, Poddar argues, Democrats could have a backup plan.

       

      “As a precaution,” Poddar explains, “the speaker could insert an automatic backup provision into the wealth tax bill, which stipulates that if the wealth tax is invalidated by the courts, the stimulus program will instead be funded by dramatically increasing marginal income tax rates for high-income earners to 80%. Thus, you have two alternative policies contained in one bill. Most Democrats — and economists — probably prefer the wealth tax as a better, fairer policy. But big increases in marginal tax rates could achieve roughly the same goal, albeit less efficiently.” Poddar continues, “By using this tactic, Congress forces conservative judges to confront an unpalatable decision: intervene and strike down the wealth tax, ushering in a more disruptive but clearly constitutional alternative policy — or let the tax stand.”

       

      When they pass legislation, Poddar recommends, Democrats need to come up with “backup provisions” to protect “progressive economic policies that are at risk of judicial invalidation.” “This is the time to act,” Poddar stresses. “Progressive policymakers and experts should flesh out this strategy, and its application to specific parts of the legislative agenda, now. That way, Congress can pass transformative legislation that will actually survive constitutional scrutiny from the stacked courts they have inherited from President Donald Trump.”

       

       

      https://www.rawstory.com/supreme-court/

       

       

       

       

      Medicare For All | The Gold Standard Health Care Plan

    • #398686
      rudycantfail
      Participant
      • Total Posts: 338

      How can anyone take anything that comes after that headline seriously?

      • #398769
        Mindwalker
        Participant
        • Total Posts: 274

        … is going to think this had a remote chance of happening.  So who the hell is this person writing to?

         

        Mmmmm, the crack is strong with this one!

         

      • #398777
        Haikugal
        Moderator
        • Total Posts: 2,117

        If I thought the dems gave a shit about us I’d say yeah, go for it but they don’t and haven’t for a long time. They are right where they want to be and have NO intention to change anything for the better especially if it would benefit the 99%.

         

        The DNC “big tent” excludes Nina Turner but includes John Kasich.
        God, guns, and gobbledygook...we live in an aquarium of nightmares.

        • #398779
          Haikugal
          Moderator
          • Total Posts: 2,117

          To correct my awkward sentence structure…

          The DNC “big tent” excludes Nina Turner but includes John Kasich.
          God, guns, and gobbledygook...we live in an aquarium of nightmares.

    • #398687
      retired liberal
      Participant
      • Total Posts: 3,748

      The OP will never happen in real life.

      We are an arrogant species, believing our fantasy based "facts" are better than the other person's fake facts.
      If you are wrong, it will be because you are not cynical enough.
      Both major political parties are special interest groups enabling each other for power and money, at the expense of the people they no longer properly serve…
      Always wear a proper mask when out and about. The life you save could be both yours and mine.

    • #398692
      djean111
      Participant
      • Total Posts: 5,827

      Looks like a way to slide what the GOP (and the fucking Vichy Democrats) really want to do into bills, that’s all.  Another Oh, golly, we really tried! piece of theater.

      America is not a country, it's just a business. (Brad Pitt, Killing Them Softly)

    • #398694
      GZeusH
      Participant
      • Total Posts: 3,662

      I like that.

      Corporate America consists of totalitarian entities laser-focused on short-term greed.

    • #398718
      NV Wino
      Moderator
      • Total Posts: 7,052

      Democrats don’t want a progressive agenda passed.

      “As we act, let us not become the evil that we deplore.” Barbara Lee
      “Politicians and pro athletes: The only people who still get paid when they lose.” William Rivers Pitt

Viewing 5 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.