Fundamental health reform like ‘Medicare for All’ would help the labor market

Homepage | Forums | Main Forums | Universal Healthcare / Medicare For All | Fundamental health reform like ‘Medicare for All’ would help the labor market

  • Author
    Posts
  • #282072

    eridani
    Donor
    • Total Posts: 5,309
    @eridani

    Fundamental health reform like ‘Medicare for All’ would help the labor market: Job loss claims are misleading, and substantial boosts to job quality are often overlooked

    Full report (13 page PDF):
    https://www.epi.org/files/pdf/186856.pdf

    The upshot: M4A creates a small amount of manageable churn but increases the overall demand for labor and boosts job quality

    The job challenge relating to a fundamental health reform is managing a relatively small increase in job churn during an initial phase-in period. Most Medicare for All plans explicitly recognize and account for the costs of providing these workers the elements of a just transition. This sort of just transition is far easier when health care is universally provided.

    Besides this challenge, the effect of fundamental reform like M4A on the labor market would be nearly uniformly positive. The effect of a fundamental reform like M4A on aggregate demand is almost certainly positive and will therefore boost the demand for labor. The number of jobs spurred by increased demand for new health care spending (including long-term care) will certainly be larger than the number displaced by realizing efficiencies in the health insurance and billing administration sectors.

    Finally, the introduction of fundamental health reform like M4A—particularly reform that substantially delinks health care provision from specific jobs—would greatly aid how the labor market functions for typical working Americans. Take-home cash pay would increase, job quality would improve, labor market transitions could be eased for employers and made less damaging to workers, and a greater range of job opportunities could be considered by workers. The increased flexibility to leave jobs should lead to more productive “matches” between workers and employers, and small businesses and self-employment could increase.

    Comment by Don McCanne of PNHP: We frequently hear about the economic catastrophe that would occur if we wiped out employment in the private health insurance industry. But is that true?

    This important report by Josh Bevins of the Economic Policy Institute describes the tremendous societal benefit from moving those jobs to more productive sectors while eliminating job-lock, giving individuals much more freedom in choosing their occupations, including more options for self-employment and small business development. The gain in employment in the health care delivery system should provide greater job satisfaction because you are helping people with their health care needs rather than being stuck in an administrative occupation in an industry that profits by reducing patient access to health care – not exactly a job that generates pride in your work.

    This report should be downloaded to be used in your advocacy work for health care reform. The health insurance industry job loss that people worry about is far more than offset by the beneficial impacts of this transitional job churn. Not only would everyone have affordable health care though single payer Medicare for All, society will also benefit from the positive effects on the labor market.

    Jesus: Hey, Dad? God: Yes, Son? Jesus: Western civilization followed me home. Can I keep it? God: Certainly not! And put it down this minute--you don't know where it's been! Tom Robbins in Another Roadside Attraction

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.