'Good day for a chokehold': the police endorsing racism and violence on Facebook

Homepage | Forums | JackPine Radical Rooms | JPR Reading Rooms | 'Good day for a chokehold': the police endorsing racism and violence on Facebook

Viewing 2 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #80202
      Judi Lynn
      Member
      • Total Posts: 5,073

      More than 100 officers have faced official repercussions after study collected 5,000 posts from eight departments

      Adam Gabbatt in New York

      @adamgabbatt
      Tue 25 Jun 2019 01.00 EDT

      One post showed a photo of a dog, apparently squatting to defecate. “Hold on I got a black lives matter movement going on right now” was the accompanying text.

      Another called for anti-fascist protesters to be “eliminated”. A third referred to “muslems” as “turd goat humpers”.

      Those are just a few examples from a database of more than 5,000 troubling Facebook posts made by police officers across eight departments in the US – a cache of variously hateful, racist and Islamophobic public messages that has so far led to more than 100 police officers being removed from active duty or barred from bringing cases to prosecutors.

      The revelations of a culture of online abusive posts by police came this month from the Plain View Project, founded by the lawyer Emily Baker-White. The Plain View Project spent 18 months examining public posts made by police officers from eight departments in the US. Baker-White’s discoveries included one officer congratulating George Zimmerman for killing the teenage Trayvon Martin, along with repeated posts encouraging violence against leftwing protesters.

      More:
      https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/jun/24/police-facebook-posts-racism-violence-plain-view-project

    • #80231
      Pam2
      Participant
      • Total Posts: 8,909

      Racist and stupid since apparently they don’t know everybody can read social media.

    • #80262
      Iorek
      Participant
      • Total Posts: 34

      Not stupid but arrogant. When the President of the United States expresses similar sentiments and their own departments look the other way, why wouldn’t they think there would be no consequences for using such vile language.

Viewing 2 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.