Here is how I have not fallen asleep.
I will bring back a post I wrote four months before the general election….from this thread.
Let’s talk about the role of the media.
The now ousted DNC chair’s outrage with Mika Brzezinski and the following strong arm letter to her superiors over Mika’s innate awareness of the DNC bias toward Clinton.
Or…..the writer that submitted his article to the DNC for review, and then following DNC recommendations, made it more favorable towards Clinton.
Everything from the media now comes into question. Capehart, Maddow, Mathews, Hayes, all of them, or their superiors, coordinating closely with Democratic headquarters to take down Sanders.
The best and most revealing response to this is; “Sanders isn’t a true Democrat.” Don’t even get me started on this line of reasoning. It infuriates me to no end.
Folks, we are only seeing the tip of the iceberg. We haven’t even touched on the election fraud that is very convincing from a statistical perspective. Hillary beat the odds over and over again. From multiple coin flip tie breakers in the Iowa primary to strategically distributed provisional ballots that ended up in shredding machines. From exit poll data conflicting with actual results to absentee ballots radically deviating from the mean. Computer analysis has yielded a convincing argument for fractional vote totalizing. A 150,000 registered Democrats mysteriously dropped from the Brooklyn register rolls. That would be the same Brooklyn as Sanders home town.
The visual senses don’t align with the results either. The optics of enthusiastic crowds, waiting in line for hours to see Sanders. The deceiving, optimizing camera shots of Clinton in small venues with small crowds, squeezing every bit of possible “enthusiasm” from a dull yawn fest of a stump speech.
The fund raising doesn’t align with the results as well. Sanders adds a brief plea during a debate, and he breaks a single day fund raising record, and to prove it wasn’t a fluke, he was able to reproduce it almost at will. Hillary? She has to send her daughter to fill in for a scheduled stump speech so she can catch a flight to meet up with some bundlers. Thank goodness Bon Jovi was there to provide entertainment for the $2700.00 sirloin brunch. Embarrassed by the disparity in contribution size, she makes a profound email plea to “Maddie” for a one dollar donation. Of course that dollar doesn’t mean shit to Clinton except that if she gets enough of them, the diluted contributions might present her as a reasonable approximation of a populist candidate…..like Sanders.
Then there is the debate schedule. I could rant about it, but I believe we have beaten it to death and everyone is quite aware of the Clinton favoritism by the DNC. It is well documented.
How convenient for the DNC to send a mole into the Sanders campaign, a plant who would eventually hack into the DNC data base, and allow for the DNC to accusingly point their finger at the Sanders campaign for illegal access. This little weasel act served three purposes. First was the initial bad press. Second was the denial of Sanders to his data in the crucial days before Super Tuesday. Third was to glean the identities of Sanders supporters from his confiscated data base. Gee……I wonder which registered Democrats were mysteriously dropped from the registers and handed provisional ballots on election day?
I put the burden of proof upon the corrupt DNC to convince us that they were not behind every fucking bit of it. I leave it to them to prove me wrong. Until then I will relentlessly present all of this as truth.
#NeverHillary #BernieOrBust #DemExitBaba OhReally, beltanefauve, KarenS and 22 othersOctafish, Tuesday, shanti, Two way street, Pam, mmonk, Enthusiast, incognito, nevereVereven, Salemcourt, ThinkingANew, canoeist52, sgcase, LiberalElite, Utopian Leftist, Peace Patriot, senz, ThouArtThat, daleanime, Punxsutawney, Marym625, djean111 like this"I welcome their hatred" Franklin D. Roosevelt
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.