What exactly *is* the status quo that both political parties are so eager to preserve?
November 18, 2019 at 10:13 PM - Views: 274 #227256
The answer to the question requires a good working understanding of the neoliberal economic experiment we have been living inside of for over 40 years.
Most of us on this site understand that neoliberal economics is the complete (and I *do* mean complete) subordination of virtually all human activities (as well as planetary biological and geological processes) to the “invisible hand” of “the markets.” And according to the high priests of neoliberalism, this system of human interaction provides each human individual with the best possible way of realizing their own full potential in society.
As the tale goes, since it is the virtue of the markets that liberates human potential, government should avoid interfering because such interference would certainly result in hampering meaningful individual human potentials.
Western governments’ primary function for hundreds of years has been to provide rules for economic interaction, primarily in protection of property, which of course has always included corporate properties of all types from physical to intellectual. For a short period of time (1930s-70s) these government systems also provided a modicum of protections for other human needs besides property, such as the right of individuals and communities to *not* be overly exploited by property owners. During this period, let’s call it Keynesian, “the economy” was understood to be a component of a functioning society, embedded therein rather than a magical system to which societies were subordinated – but no longer is this the case.
So let’s get to the point… what is the status quo in the relationship between governments and markets? To me the best way to figure this out would be to look at the current and historical activities of government and investigate the markets that these government activities have created and/or “liberated.”
There are many pivot points along the road from Keynesian mid 20th Century to today, but I am going to highlight just a few:
This law created “fast track” authority for trade agreements where the president could negotiate an agreement internationally and then put it before Congress for ratification. On paper this sounds somewhat reasonable, however Congressional debate is capped, filibuster is disallowed and a majority of each house is all that is required to pass a “trade agreement.” To some observers, a “trade agreement” seems a lot like a treaty. The authors of our Constitution understood that treaties had the capacity to affect large sectors of the U.S. society and economy and were in fact the creation of transnational laws. Article II tells us that a treaty becomes part of the fabric of our own federal law, and since this law was negotiated with foreign nations it must receive a 2/3 vote of the Senate to ensure that is truly in the best interest of the U.S. The Trade Act said, “fuck that! We’ll never get anything done that way.” However, at this time “trade” was essentially in material things like minerals, food and manufactured goods.
Gramm–Leach–Bliley Act/Financial Services Modernization Act of 1999
Basically, this law removed The Depression era Glass/Steagall Act firewall between the mundane functions of banking (savings and lending) and investing. I’m not going to go into depth here, but this let banks gamble more of their depositors money than was previously allowed, resulting in layers of derivatization ostensibly to insulate against risk, but lying and cheating combined with zero legal penalty, meant that in reality it Ponzi-fied the world economy by forcing Wall Street’s will on everyone.
Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
These good fellows fixed things up for us after The Treasury and Federal Reserve Bank bailed out the banks and “the street” to the tune of many trillions of dollars. We couldn’t possibly manage such a bailout again. Frankly it’s astonishing that it happened the first time without a massive revolt. The beauty of this bit of legislation is that if your bank is big enough you can now get a bailout any time without much fanfare – definitely no need to appear before a committee and be castigated on TV by people like Senator Sanders. When you’re running a little low on capital, the Fed will perform some financial magic by “injecting liquidity into the markets” or maybe provide some “quantitative easing.” Of course the magic really means the “markets” now get free money to keep them from falling over while everyone else gets austerity.
General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS)
Trade in services is ultimately the way in which every individual will be subjugated to to the magical neoliberal economic system that operates outside of human society. Need programmers and network engineers? Need nurses and doctors for your hospital? We’ll send you a bunch of cheap ones from India or China so you can fire the expensive skilled employees that live in your communities.
Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) as codified in trade agreements like NAFTA
ISDS is insane. Unelected international tribunals are given the power to settle disputes between investors (viewed as operating *outside of* or *above* national sovereignty) and specific “sovereign” nations. The “disputes” generally take the form of an investor (read transnational corporation) claiming that due to a “sovereign” nation’s audacity to pass laws intended to protect the interests of its citizens, the investor’s expected future profits have been reduced. This is so much fun that hedge funds now invest in these suits – not in the companies who’s “expected future profits” are now in doubt, but in the placing of bets on the suits themselves (https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2017/04/investor-state-dispute-settlement-isds-suits-become-favored-hedge-fund-investment.html).
Let us also not forget that the various “trade agreements” that are being/have been negotiated are negotiated and written in secrecy. Even the elected officials responsible for voting on these agreements in a “fast track” process generally get no opportunity to view the text of these agreements until they are done. For the few that do get to have a look ahead of time, they are given limitied access to the document to read in a secured environment where they are forbidden from having so much as a post-it and a pencil to jot down their concerns with and impressions of what they read.
And just in case you still think that the status quo protectors have our best interests in mind (I know you don’t), the existence of this particular 1997 memo (https://www.truthdig.com/articles/larry-summers-and-the-end-game-memo/) discovered some 15 or so years later ought to change your mind.
No one who is a casual consumer of news will know these details by design, and the main stream media (MSM) is invested in keeping it that way. MSM will continue to push the idea that this neoliberal experiment *is* as real and natural as the air we breath, and John Q will believe it.
The final chapter of this story isn’t yet written, but for the authors of the neoliberal experiment it means the subjugation of all human activity to the will of capital – plain and simple. One world government run by Goldman Sachs and the rest of the Wall Street mafia.
November 18, 2019 at 11:56 PM #227326Populist ProleParticipant
- Total Posts: 440
Excellent post, thank you.
Bookmarking for reference.
November 19, 2019 at 12:47 AM #227341game meatParticipant
- Total Posts: 1,239
Nice job putting all that together so succinctly.
November 19, 2019 at 1:25 PM #227502
@gamemeat i should find a place to stick Citizens United in there
November 29, 2019 at 9:44 PM #232256
Huge plus one!
I would like to remind you that U.S. health insurance companies do not contribute anything to health care. They are only a PARASITIC middle man receiving an undeserved cut of "FREE MONEY".
November 19, 2019 at 2:57 PM #227553
@hobbit709 yup. that is the result. and the intended path forward is intended to lock that in
November 19, 2019 at 1:12 AM #227353Flying SquirrelParticipant
- Total Posts: 546
Ok. But “your” should be “you’re” and “it’s” should be “its.”
November 19, 2019 at 8:51 AM #227472
November 19, 2019 at 1:43 PM #227508retired liberalParticipant
- Total Posts: 2,697
Boiled down to its essence – Money trough.
The rich and powerful feeding at the money trough, kept full by any means, as long as the rich and powerful don’t need to contribute more than seed money.
We are an arrogant species, believing our fantasy based "facts" are better than the other person's fake facts.
If you are wrong, it will be because you are not cynical enough.
Both major political parties are special interest groups enabling each other for power and money, at the expense of the people they no longer properly serve…
Always wear a proper mask when out and about. The life you save could be both yours and mine.
November 19, 2019 at 2:39 PM #227531
@retiredliberal that’s a pretty good analogy…
what happened at the money trough in 2008 is that megawealth had been gorging themselves for so long that they choked and puked. then obama played janitor like the ones that would come into the classroom in 2nd grade to clean up puke. he spread that weird minty smelling stuff everywhere in an attempt to mask the stench of the vomit, but just like i remember from 2nd grade, the minty shit was a more gag inducing smell than the puke itself.
November 19, 2019 at 2:14 PM #227522MizzGrizzParticipant
- Total Posts: 2,005
What a succinct analysis.
November 19, 2019 at 2:41 PM #227540Hobbit709Participant
- Total Posts: 1,785
The 1% get everything and we get all the crap-that is the status quo.
I don't waste my time teaching pigs to sing.
November 19, 2019 at 3:03 PM #227559Ohio BarbarianModerator
- Total Posts: 14,557
Superb. Recommended for the Daily Radical. No, make that demanded for the Daily Radical. @deadpool
It is better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.--Eugene Debs
Show me a man that gets rich by being a politician, and I'll show you a crook.--Harry Truman
November 29, 2019 at 9:25 PM #232252
This is why we are here.
November 19, 2019 at 10:54 PM #227735DeadpoolKeymaster
- Total Posts: 4,020
November 19, 2019 at 11:55 PM #227782sadoldgirlParticipant
- Total Posts: 812
So Dodd/Frank is then responsible for the Fed giving
billions to the repo-banks. I thought though that
somewhere the decision was made to end bailout
and replace it with bailin, which would fleece the
November 29, 2019 at 9:23 PM #232251
Kicked and recommended to the fucking MAX!
This should be widely understood. The authors of such government should be in fucking prison!
It is clear that a government operated in such a manner should be viewed as an enemy of the people.
November 29, 2019 at 9:58 PM #232260
+++++ to in prison.
their plan = death to the planet.
November 29, 2019 at 11:30 PM #232320Electrolyte OrchestraParticipant
- Total Posts: 303
A related issue is money supply. The government stopped printing the M3 in 2006. This basically made certain non-cash financial maneuvers and amounts opaque. The 2008 bailout involved trillions and the public has no way of seeing exactly what went on with elements like the TAF window, government real estate purchases and sales among many other items.
I think if they did print the real number again, inflation would skyrocket.
November 30, 2019 at 5:26 PM #232513JunkerParticipant
- Total Posts: 175
Thanks for posting this.
December 1, 2019 at 6:36 PM #232769
December 1, 2019 at 7:38 PM #232785djean111Participant
- Total Posts: 4,077
The rich get richer and the poor get poorer.
And the OP illustrates why I believe the Trump impeachment is just a distraction. There may satisfied revenge for some, but neither party means to make our lives anything but worse. Both complicit.
December 2, 2019 at 3:31 PM #233020rampartParticipant
- Total Posts: 535
+1. best post this week.
“there is no alternative.” thatcher on neoliberalism
the “Washington consensus” :
1.Fiscal policy discipline, with avoidance of large fiscal deficits relative to GDP;
2.Redirection of public spending from subsidies (“especially indiscriminate subsidies”) toward broad-based provision of key pro-growth, pro-poor services like primary education, primary health care and infrastructure investment;
3.Tax reform, broadening the tax base and adopting moderate marginal tax rates;
4.Interest rates that are market determined and positive (but moderate) in real terms;
5.Competitive exchange rates;
6.Trade liberalization: liberalization of imports, with particular emphasis on elimination of quantitative restrictions (licensing, etc.); any trade protection to be provided by low and relatively uniform tariffs;
7.Liberalization of inward foreign direct investment;
8.Privatization of state enterprises;
9.Deregulation: abolition of regulations that impede market entry or restrict competition, except for those justified on safety, environmental and consumer protection grounds, and prudential oversight of financial institutions;
10.Legal security for property rights.
December 2, 2019 at 3:56 PM #233027mindpilotParticipant
- Total Posts: 369
Slavery was the legal fiction that people can be property.
Corporatism is the legal fiction that property can be people.
"If you believe in god, I'm probably smarter than you." -- Tom Leykis
December 11, 2019 at 5:19 AM #236911Mr. Mickeys MomModerator
- Total Posts: 3,621
So worth staying up late after not being here all day… A MUST reference because when I try to explain how dollars are replacing people and corporations are people and we are W A Y past fixing this, I need that timeline.
Hell, no... I'm not giving up...
January 10, 2020 at 3:10 PM #248773salemcourtParticipant
- Total Posts: 1,471
Great article! Sending it to my neo-liberal friends who are absolutely unaware of any of this. A great indictment of capitalism.
January 11, 2020 at 10:14 PM #249282Captain ArizonaParticipant
- Total Posts: 164
The deep corporate state establishment controls republican party as useful tool and tamp down the far right when it gets to weird. It controls democrat party so people like bernie and aoc are no threat let alone the far left. Ever notice that the movie channels only show movies of loners battling the establishment like rambo. When is the last time you saw movies about collective action like is paris burning and battle of algeirs which chaney prevented dubya from seeing when it was shown to pentagon brass so they could see what they were in for.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.