What really happened in DC – Fiorella / Convo Couch

another actor?

https://www.backstage.com/u/fiorellamayorca/media/photos

plus her voice grates like hell and her organization sucks: she doesn’t ‘lay it all out’

sorry to focus on technical features but she doesn’t seem to be saying anything useful, just her opinions, and she takes way too long to get to any kind of point

38 minutes in and she is still droning on in that voice of whiny self-righteousness your sister had when she was tattling on you to mom

@coldmountaintrail:

She was there, you were not. She described her experience,

which has been agreed to by other social media people. If you

just get the news from M$M,PBS or NPR, then you have to

realize that they serve the purpose of the establishment. Trump

is not important anymore, unless we encourage the RW to hold

on to him. 74 million voters cannot be shoved under the table

with disgust, and most of them are working class. Not all of them are poor,

but I have yet to see Beezos, Gates, Zuckerberg or Soros join in such

an event. And yet, these and other power brokers are the ones, who intend

to control us.

When watching this Jimmy Dore Show about the Capitol incident one can clearly see that some of the police were reluctant to intervene against the surprise visitors. Some even took selfies with them. The police may have been overwhelmed and decided that more fighting would have been counterproductive. Or, maybe, they let it happen on purpose?

The LIHOP theory is often applied to the 9/11 incident in 2001. The FBI and others knew that terrorist from the Middle East were about to use air planes to attack within the U.S. but it was decided to let that happen and to use the event for political gain. That political gain came in form of the Patriot Act which gave the government more power to spy on its citizens, and in form of the war of terror on the Middle East.

Even weeks before Wednesday’s event there had been lots of open source chatter about a big protest in Washington and plans to take on the Capitol. Like in in 455, when the Vandals sacked Rome, there was little done by the local authorities to prevent that. The actors in both incidents have by the way remarkable similarities.

If we consider that ‘Vandals’ storming the Capitol was known to be upcoming and that the vandals actually managed to do it, we have to look for potential aims of those who might have allowed it to happen.

LINK–Moon of Alabama, Democrats Use Capitol Incident To Suppress Political Dissent

Fiorella is not the only one to feel this way. Something is afloat and it is not right.

As many know, there has been a disinformation campaign in the United States of America. We see all the time in the M$M, we are seeing it now.

Now Biden says we need more laws to protect ourselves. Bullshit, every one of those people who participated in the riot (that is the correct term) at the Capital Building can be charge with murder because of the deaths of Ex-Air Force Women and the Capital Policeman. We have enough laws to put everyone who was at the riot in jail for a long time. In other words, we have plenty of laws, use them. What people like Biden want is more surveillance of the civilian population. That means you and I have no privacy because of these insecure authoritarian ass-hats. There are people lining up to fight this, it is in the article above.

If you cannot dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit WC Fields

@coldmountaintrail:

So she had nothing of importance to say? She reported on

many items that anti-Trumpers don’t want to hear. Please,

refrain from criticism of her voice, because it really sounds

shallow, just like people criticized Hillary’s voice. That is

totally irrelevant to the issue involved. Okay, if she was

longwinded to you, many of us appreciated her explanations.

I got a bit upset with TB for repetitions; yet that does not

take away from important messages from both of them. So,

the question really comes down to it: Are you attacking the

messenger or her message? If the first, it is using typical

smear attacks, if the second, please state where she is wrong.

Hoping to get the gist of what she said from posters who managed to sit through it.

I could not.

Guess I’ll have to get this information elsewhere.

she contests the arguments that this was some coherent mob of Trump supporters – yes Trump voters include white supremacists but lots of people (multiple groups, ethnicities, ages, etc.) from other walks of life along the right political spectrum; she argues why/how one could easily contest that voting system and the 2020 election was fraudulent; and she also contests that Trump’s speech advocated inciting violence.  She explains how and why her narrative differs from conventional narratives which coincidentally has been accepted by the majority of the left and why the conventional narrative ends up in polarization and destructive through censorship the goals of the left.   That’s how I would capture what she says with the caveat that I believe she is correct….

In most historical events, most primary sources (actual participants in those events) have varying views /interpretations of what actually happened….It is well worthwhile reviewing a variety of sources.

My info on this is 3rd hand so take it with a grain of salt. A friend on mine (not a very close friend) has a friend who works for the Capitol Police. He was there and said the police were unprepared. Their main job is to protect the people and not the property. They knew if they escalated they would not have the manpower to stop it. What I saw in many of the videos makes sense with that in mind. I know some of it looks bad, like the selfies, but those idiots probably weren’t seen as a threat to the people.