Why You Couldn’t Find Big Media Coverage of Haaland and Davids

Homepage | Forums | Main Forums | General Discussion | Why You Couldn’t Find Big Media Coverage of Haaland and Davids

Viewing 2 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #9394
      joentokyo
      Participant
      • Total Posts: 1,026

      https://www.yesmagazine.org/peace-justice/why-you-couldnt-find-big-media-coverage-of-haaland-and-davids-20190104

      “A society of sheep must in time beget a government of wolves” ~ French philosopher Bertrand de Jouvenel (1903-1987)

    • #9399
      mrdmk
      Participant
      • Total Posts: 2,257

      Why You Couldn’t Find Big Media Coverage of Haaland and Davids

      Time has run out to convince colonized newsrooms that Indigenous issues and perspectives are necessary to the national narrative.

      I got the call around the time I was scrolling my Twitter feed, wiping my eyes dry over the immense promise I felt watching U.S. Rep. Deb Haaland (D-N.M.) and U.S. Rep. Sharice Davids (D-Kan.) share that heartfelt hug on the House floor yesterday. It was a cable news producer from a network that will remain anonymous, and he was calling to book a panel. He’d heard I knew a few things about Native Americans and its geopolitical frame of reference — except, that’s not what he wanted to talk to me about. He wanted to know if I could sit on a televised segment to discuss Elizabeth Warren.

      He yammered on while I continued to gaze at Twitter, feasting on photo after photo of history literally happening right before my eyes: two Native American women like me doing what has never been done before — breaking into one of the highest political arenas in the land. I waited until the producer stopped talking.

      I politely told him that the problem with Elizabeth Warren isn’t expired controversy over her silly DNA test and, now, her bid for the presidency. Rather, I said, it’s Warren and the media itself capitalizing on this issue and ignoring the very Native Americans central to the debate—arguably the most marginalized voices in the country.

      I suggested the segment be realigned to focus on the day’s unprecedented inauguration of Davids and Haaland into the U.S. House, but he said the panel was mostly booked to discuss the Democratic dilemma over whether to support Warren. He wanted a voice critical of the Massachusetts senator, assuming that this person would be me — both Democrat and anti-Warren. He said mention of Davids and Haaland could be as an aside; an afterthought.

      (link in OP)

      If you cannot dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit WC Fields

    • #9401
      Bearian
      Participant
      • Total Posts: 598
Viewing 2 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.