rachaelseven

By 2024?!? By then it would need to be $18-20. So lame.

Hard to imagine how it wouldn’t affect the accuracy of the polls. There’s obviously a serious selection bias issue in terms of people who are willing to answer telephone polls. The question is, what other characteristics are shared by those who self-select to take these phone polls. It seems almost inconceivable that they wouldn’t share some…[Read more]

If Progressives could really cause any trouble for the bankers, they wouldn’t be there. More video clips of Congress critters asking bankers “tough” questions isn’t going to do a thing. It’s intended to give the progressives the photo ops the establishment think they want (since that’s what the establishment types would want), nothing more.

There’s always a lot of talk about “holding their feet to the fire”. Well, it may be news to the establishment loyalist “resistance”, but primaries are how we actually do that. Do what we want, or we will replace you. A message so simple even a politician can understand it.

Oh no, they ARE that dumb. There just aren’t that many of them and they leave the donating to the big players – I mean, what good is their $30 going to do in the face of the billions that she raised from her real constituency.

It doesn’t look good or function well. Articles are half the width of the page and comments squeeze down to illegibility within 3 layers of replies. It’s hard to use, doesn’t work well, and further work is most likely wasted effort. We should revert to 2.0 and look for better software.

Single best description of the modern American presidency I’ve ever heard. Mind if I borrow it?

I know the kind of work that goes into this stuff and I’m always hesitant to post complaints. I just miss those features from 2.0 very much. I appreciate your efforts and anything you can safely/comfortably do to bring back some of those features would be very welcome. Thank you!